Dear
Everybody,
There is a saying, the origin of which
escapes me, that goes like this: "When the mountain does not go to
Mohamed, Mohamed goes to the mountain!" This is what comes to mind with
respect to the recent debates about Science and Research in economically
disadvantaged countries.
The world is not homogeneous and the world is
fairer if it becomes homogeneous with respect to opportunities offered to its
citizens. Perhaps not everybody agrees with this statement, but I believe the
majority does. Scientists do not have the same opportunities and the same
resources around the world either to develop and present their work, or to
listen to other people's work. A lot of talent goes wasted and a lot of
scientific progress is hindered because of that.
It has often been suggested that scientists
from ex-Eastern block countries should be offered special allowances to
participate to major International Conferences, or page charge wavers to
publish in certain re-known journals (NOTE: IAPR sponsored journals are
re-known and do not have page charges-I have to put from time to time a good
word for IAPR otherwise the Executive committee will dismiss me!). Conference
organizers, and journal managers, however, have to balance their books at the
end of the day, and this is not always easy. Besides, there are several
countries, apart from the ex-Soviet block where the salaries and resources of
the academics are orders of magnitude lower than those in the Western world.
Where does one draw the line? Which scientists should be helped and which
should be left to struggle on their own? Perhaps the mountain cannot he moved
to Mohamed! But then, maybe we can make Mohamed move to the mountain! What
about organizing our major events in less privileged countries? What about sponsoring/adopting/enhancing
their major events and publications? Clearly, one should not organize the nth
ICPR among some starving tribes in Africa; they would hardly be benefited from
it!
However, there are plenty of countries with
substantial intellect to offer that could host most if not all of our major
outlets of expertise! True, scientists from Western countries will probably
loose something if that policy were to be adopted, but it would be a mere
scratch in their budget and a mere ripple in their CVs not to be able to claim
the organization of a major scientific event! On the other hand, they will have
the chance to travel to some of the countries that had been closed to the
western visitor for decades if not for centuries!
For things to work, however, nice ideals must
be escorted by nice money! Nobody likes to feel that is taken for a ride and
that is the feeling created if American prices are charged in countries where
things and services cost orders of magnitude less than in America! Perhaps conference
organizers of countries that need to be helped should bear that in mind when
they set up their budgets. It must be remembered that fares to such countries
are usually very expensive for the western visitor and this expense should be
compensated by the local expenses being kept low. Only then will Mohamed be
able to go to the mountain, meet the local people, talk with them, listen to
them, learn from them, teach them and be friends happily ever after!
And as the season calls it:
PEACE ON EARTH AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Maria
Petrou